OpenCode
MIT license, no vendor account involved; with a local model, data never leaves the server.
Verified: Sep 13next price check: Dec 12

Facts with sources
- In the ServerFlow benchmark across 16 tasks, the shells cluster together; OpenClaw and OpenCode held up more consistently than the rest; in one of seven runs the agent read 280K tokens and produced no working result. Source (in Russian)
- A local server with an H100 costs upward of 6.5 million rubles; payback at these volumes exceeds 160 years. Source (in Russian)
- Electricity is about 42% cheaper than the same tokens via API, but that doesn’t offset the hardware cost. Source (in Russian)
Strengths
- Open source, 75+ providers and free with your own keys; the $10/month Go plan gives roughly $60 of usage by reviewers' estimates.
- Bryan Software: about 7k tokens of baseline overhead before you type, against roughly 33k for Claude Code, with noticeably better caching.
- For Jimmy Garcia the free tool transcribed 14 minutes into 103 phrases, cut an EDL and rendered 1080p in about four hours.
- Plan and build modes, custom agents via config, LSP feeding compiler errors back to the model, and resumable sessions.
Weaknesses
- Anthropic blocked subscription sign-in in January 2026: Claude only works through an API key, billed per token on top of any subscription.
- Jimmy Garcia's agent could not read images and never checked its render: 30 seconds of black on a 4:07 video, captions covering the picture.
- Bryan Software: on simple tasks 3 to 6 times more tokens than Pi, with users reporting 12k to 24k tokens for a plain 'hi' versus 4k.
- Jimmy Garcia's pre-production files (title, description, hashtags) came out empty, so the published video went up with placeholders.
Example from practice
Edit and publish a video through an existing pipeline
Jimmy Garcia gave OpenCode the same skills, production rules and prompt as Claude Code: turn three screen recordings and two voice tracks into a finished, published video. Running NVIDIA's Nemotron 3 Ultra in the cloud at no extra charge, OpenCode transcribed 14 minutes of speech into 103 timestamped phrases, built a narration script from his own words, cut an EDL, graded the clips, rendered 1080p and mastered the audio to -14.1 LUFS, all in just over four hours. But it could not read image files and never looked at its own output: the published 4:07 video had 30 seconds of black at the end, an empty 26-second end card and captions covering most of the frame. His verdict: he would switch for free, but it is not there yet.
What reviewers say
Reviewer opinions on their own tasks and hardware, not measurements. Links go to the videos; transcripts live in docs/raw-data.
- I Pay $100 a Month for Claude Code. I Gave Free OpenCode the Same Job. · Jimmy Garcia III (Claude Code), Sep 3The reviewer says the editing was genuinely good, but what you pay a harness for is checking and validating its own output, and OpenCode had no equivalent.
- OpenCode vs Codex: Which AI Coding Agent Is Actually Better? (2026) · Tinkr | Reviews & Guides, Aug 18The reviewer frames OpenCode as a harness rather than a Codex rival: it wins on model freedom and cost, while ChatGPT subscribers are better off with Codex.
- OpenCode: Is It Worth Switching To? · Bryan Software, Aug 27The reviewer's line: switch to OpenCode Go for complex work, but for short, simple back-and-forth a lighter tool like Pi is the better call.
- Is Pi the Best Coding Agent? Pi vs OpenCode vs Claude Code · pookie, May 24The reviewer moved from OpenCode to Pi for minimalism; he credits OpenCode for open source, any model and easy custom agents, but says it feels like a separate app.
Who it is for
- Team of up to fifteen people without a security sign-off
- Company with a ban on external services
Models in this agent
Score is from our manager-task benchmark; models without a score are not measured yet.
How to brief an agent like this
The four-line brief is the Foundation module: prompt structure, LLM agents and MCP, an AI policy for the team. It starts with the free open module.