ChatGPT

4 Prompt Engineering Techniques Tested on 7 Models: Workshop Guide

30 min read

“Analyze this project and give recommendations” – one prompt, seven models, and GPT-5.4 produced 2,231 words of vague advice while Claude Sonnet delivered 11 complimentary phrases like “excellent budget structure.” Rewriting the prompt using a five-element structure brought all seven models down to 346–443 words, and the praise disappeared. Token savings: 41% to 79% depending on the model.

This isn’t theory. This is data from a “Prompt Engineering in Practice” workshop I ran at the IIBA conference. One project brief, four techniques, seven models, 28 runs – and $0.054 total. Cheaper than a vending machine coffee.

Read more
4 Prompt Engineering Techniques Tested on 7 Models: Workshop Guide
ChatGPT in 2026: What Changed and Where Managers Should Start
15 min

ChatGPT in 2026: What Changed and Where Managers Should Start

By 2026, calling ChatGPT just a “chatbot” feels off. It’s a working platform with several models, search, deep research, an agent mode, image generation, and Codex for development. The Sora video platform, previously part of the ecosystem, was retired as a consumer product in April 2026. And precisely because of that, newcomers find it harder to grasp the main thing: what among all of this does an ordinary manager actually need, and what still matters only to power users and tech teams.

33 AI Models for Managers: Why We Need Your Ratings
11 min

33 AI Models for Managers: Why We Need Your Ratings

Over the past year, 33 new AI models have appeared on the market, each claiming the title of “best manager’s assistant.” ChatGPT updated to GPT-5.2, Claude released Opus 4.5, Gemini added a new Pro version, Yandex and Sber announced further improvements, and Chinese models went OpenSource. How do you choose a tool when every one of them promises a productivity revolution? We decided to run a large-scale comparative study – but ran into a problem that may seem paradoxical.